Érdekes kijelentés ez Miguel-től...

Miguel de Icaza írta:

"OOXML is a superb standard and yet, it has been FUDed so badly by its competitors that serious people believe that there is something fundamentally wrong with it. This is at a time when OOXML as a spec is in much better shape than any other spec on that space.

Besides, it is always better to have two implementations and then standardize than trying to standardize a single implementation."

Fura gyerek ez a Miguel.

Ebben a szálban írta.

( phanatic | 2007. 09. 11., k – 10:14 )

huh, ezek utan mar kezdek aggodni erte...

( snq- | 2007. 09. 11., k – 11:09 )

"But Michael[ Meeks]'s criticism (or for that matter, the Novell OpenOffice
team working with that spec) seems to be incredibly different than the
laundry list of issues that pass as technical reviews in sites like Groklaw.

The difference is that the Novell-based criticism is based on actually
trying to implement the spec. Not reading the spec for the sake of finding
holes that can be used in a political battle.

Finally, Michael sounded incredibly positive after the ECMA meeting last
month when all of their technical questions were either answered or added to
the batch of things to review. I know you are going to say "The spec is
not owned by ECMA", well, currently the working group that will review the
ISO comments is at ECMA."

( snq- | 2007. 09. 11., k – 11:47 )

jaj, nagyon jól beszél a slashdoton is [1] [2] [3] [..], meg mókás is

--
not sure if Rob Weir is part of "our" community or part of the FUDosphere

( NagyZ v | 2007. 09. 11., k – 14:58 )

nem fura, csak igaza van. nem kene annyira fudolni, hamar
m$ csinalt egy jo szabvanyt :-)

mellesleg tenyleg jobb ketto, mint egy.

mig bannolva voltam hihetetlen milyen mokas postok voltak
itt, pl az a barom aki irta hogy "MENTSUK MEG A SZABVANYT",
vagy mi a halal. jokat rohogtem :))