terjed az opensource az EU kormanyzatokban

• Roughly
  half (49%) of local government authorities report some intentional
  use of FLOSS. However, a large additional population (29%) reports
  using FLOSS software, such as GNU/Linux, MySQL or Apache, but are
  unaware that these are FLOSS.
• Within
  organisations, partial use on servers dominates (40%) followed by
  partial use on desktops (16%). 20% experiment in pilot projects.
  Complete use is very rare, whether on desktop or server.

• Demand exists: 70% of FLOSS
  users and 38% of non-users want to increase FLOSS use. Awareness of
  FLOSS leads to increased willingness to use it regardless of current
  use/non-use.

• More than a fifth of those
  wanting to increase FLOSS use want a complete migration to
  FLOSS.

• Perceived advantages of FLOSS
  include: customisation and the ability to combine it with existing
  proprietary systems. Barriers perceived by non-users include
  cost of training and being the first among peer organisations to
  adopt FLOSS. The experience of current users leads them not to see
  such barriers, and to appreciate the advantages more strongly than
  non-users.

• Organisations valuing
  interoperability are much more likely to increase FLOSS use.
• For non-users, who are more
  likely to use external maintenance services, a sense of vendor
  dependency and the need to customise software are strong drivers to
  future FLOSS use.
• Small budgets lead to “unaware”

  FLOSS use rather than intentional use or non-use of FLOSS.

• Licence fees account for 20% of
  IT budgets. Half of all respondents find this too high. This
  perception leads to increased future FLOSS use, especially among
  current non-users.
• FLOSS users administer 35% more
  PCs per IT administrator than non-users – FLOSS use appears to
  reduce administrator workload per PC, and IT departments with high
  workloads are more likely to want a future increase in FLOSS use.

forras: FLOSSPOLS Deliverable D3: Results from the local governments survey