Az EU figyelmeztette az Apple-t, hogy nyissa meg az iOS-t a harmadik féltől származó connected eszközök előtt

Ja, a hupkon en vagyok az egyetlen, aki iPhone-t vesz termeszetesen.

Nem mindegy, hogy egy már meglevő feature-t kell rollout-olni új piacra, vagy fejleszteni valamit aminek a gátlásán évekig dolgoztál

Fel evuk van rendszerszintu API-kat megnyitogatni. Mikor most volt major release es egy ev mulvara van tervben a kovetkezo.

Es ha nem tartjak be fizessek be a revenue 10%-at buntikent.

Szerinted ez igy realis elvaras?

🤖 (Grok): Based on the information available up to September 20, 2024, here are some brief examples where Thierry Breton's policies have been criticized for potentially hurting EU innovation:

1. EU AI Act: Critics argue that this legislation imposes strict compliance requirements on AI developers, particularly for "high-risk" AI systems. This might increase the cost and complexity of developing AI technologies in Europe, potentially driving AI innovation to more regulatory lenient regions like the US. 

2. Digital Markets Act (DMA): While aimed at ensuring fair competition, there's a perspective that the stringent rules could inadvertently disadvantage smaller tech companies in the EU or startups due to high compliance costs, thus stifling innovation.

3. Resignation and Sentiment from Tech Community: Following Thierry Breton's resignation, there was a sentiment expressed on platforms like X that his policies were seen as a burden to innovation. For instance, his approach was perceived to create a hostile environment for tech companies, which might have encouraged some to move their operations or focus their growth outside of the EU.

4. Regulation Over Innovation: There's a narrative that Breton's push for heavy regulation, although aimed at protecting consumers and ensuring ethical AI development, might slow down the pace at which new technologies can be developed and adopted within the EU. This could be seen as placing Europe at a competitive disadvantage compared to regions with more relaxed regulatory environments.

5. Impact on Startups: Comments from startup founders and tech commentators on platforms like X suggested that policies championed by Breton, like the AI Act, made it exceedingly difficult to start or scale AI startups in the EU, thereby potentially hurting the region's position in the global tech landscape.

These examples reflect a perspective where regulation, although well-intentioned for consumer protection and fair market practices, might come at the cost of agility in innovation, particularly in fast-evolving sectors like AI and digital services. However, it's worth mentioning that these criticisms represent one side of the debate, with others arguing that such regulations could lead to more sustainable and ethically sound technological development in the long term.

Mennyi munkaerőt fog kivonni emiatt az Apple EU-ból? 

🤖 (Grok): Recent sentiments and discussions, especially highlighted by prominent figures like Mario Draghi, indicate a growing concern over the European Union's regulatory environment being perceived as hostile towards technology companies. Here are some brief examples and mentions of this trend:

1. General Sentiment on Regulation: Mario Draghi has explicitly stated that EU regulations are killing innovation, suggesting that the legislative environment is pushing tech companies away. This has been echoed across various discussions on platforms like X, where users and commentators have noted the adverse effects of EU tech laws.

2. Start-ups and Stock Exchanges: There have been reports, like those mentioned in posts from X, about European stock exchanges raising alarms over start-ups choosing to move to Wall Street. This indicates a shift where emerging tech companies prefer the US due to a more favorable business and regulatory climate.

3. Tech Company Relocation Discussions: High-profile discussions and criticisms from within the EU, like those from Thierry Breton's policies being seen as hostile to tech companies, suggest that there's been an exodus or consideration thereof, due to which tech companies might look for more welcoming environments like the US.

4. Direct Quotes and Opinions from X: Various posts on X reflect a narrative where EU's stringent regulations, especially those around AI and digital services, are seen as self-defeating. For instance, discussions around the Digital Markets Act (DMA) and the Artificial Intelligence Act suggest these regulations might be too restrictive, prompting companies to consider relocating.

5. Corporate Taxation and Regulatory Reasons: Although less directly tied to tech-specific regulation, general corporate taxation and regulatory burdens have historically led companies to reconsider their geographical base. While not exclusively a 2024 phenomenon, this continues to factor into why tech companies might prefer locations outside the EU.

These examples are drawn from public sentiment and statements rather than an exhaustive list of companies that have moved out. The discussion largely revolves around the regulatory environment being less conducive to tech innovation and business growth, prompting a rethink of where tech companies choose to base their operations. However, for specific names of companies or more detailed case studies, further investigation or corporate announcements would be necessary.

Elo Scores by AI Company  that's how it evolved 

https://x.com/emrancaan/status/1837076408130002962?s=61

| Company        | Economic Area          |
|----------------|------------------------|
| OpenAI         | United States          |
| Google         | United States          |
| xAI            | United States          |
| Anthropic      | United States          |
| Meta           | United States          |
| Mistral        | European Union (France)|
| DeepSeek       | China                  |
| O1 AI          | United States          |

----------

World's top 20 companies by generative AI patents in 2023:

1.🇨🇳 Tencent: 2,074
2.🇨🇳 Ping An Insurance: 1,564
3.🇨🇳 Baidu: 1,234
4.🇺🇸 IBM: 601
5.🇨🇳 Alibaba Group: 571
6.🇰🇷 Samsung: 468
7.🇺🇸 Google: 443
8.🇨🇳 ByteDance: 418
9.🇨🇳 BBK Electronics: 377
10.🇺🇸 Microsoft: 377
11.🇨🇳 NetEase: 337
12.🇯🇵 NTT: 330
13.🇨🇳 Huawei: 328
14.🇨🇳 China Mobile: 300
15.🇨🇳 State Grid: 291
16.🇺🇸 Adobe: 257
17.🇯🇵 Sony Group: 218
18.🇩🇪 Siemens: 208
19.🇨🇳 Ant Group: 202
20.🇨🇳 ICBC: 191

https://x.com/stats_feed/status/1837060923413975548?s=61

----------

Here's a brief overview of notable Generative Video AI companies along with their economic areas:

| Company              | Economic Area                              |
|----------------------|--------------------------------------------|
|   Synthesia          | Global, focus in Europe & North America    |
|   Runway (RunwayML)  | New York City, USA                         |
|   Stability AI       | London, UK, with global operations         |
|   Meta               | Menlo Park, California, USA                |
|   Adobe              | San Jose, California, USA                  |
|   Anthropic          | San Francisco, California, USA             |
|   Google (DeepMind)  | Mountain View, California, USA             |
|   Microsoft          | Redmond, Washington, USA                   |
|   Amazon (AWS)       | Seattle, Washington, USA                   |
|   Cohere             | Toronto, Canada, with global reach         |

De ha a jelentős piaci erővel rendelkező szereplő termékével nem vagyok megelégedve ilyen-olyan okból (akár csak mert nem kompatibilis más gyártók termékeivel, vagy más gyártók termékei nem kompatibilisek vele), akkor megveszem más nagy piaci erővel rendelkező szereplő termékét. Nem véletlenül használom az apple cuccait. Egyszerűen csak nem szeretném, hogy olyan megbízhatatlan legyen, mint a többi. Lehet, hogy megveszem a sokadik osztályú kínai gyártó valamilyen cuccát és azt várom, hogy az iOS-es eszközömmel működjön, mert rá van írva, hogy kompatibilis az iOS-el, aztán kiderül, hogy kalap kakát sem ér........... addig, míg ezt a marhaságot nem erőltetik rá az Apple-re, addig nagyobb magabiztossággal tudom megvenni az adott eszközt, mert már a vásárláskor nyugodt vagyok, hogy kifogástalanul fog működni minden.
Van pl. egy Decathlon-os aktivitásmérőm (mert olcsó), de hol szinkronizál az iOS-es alkalmazásával, hol nem, hol jelzi ha hívásom vagy üzenetem jön, hol nem; van egy Decathlon-os alkalmazással kompatibilis szobabringám, amit  hol megtalál az alkalmazás a bluetoot-on keresztül, hol pedig negyed órát kell könyörögni neki...... szóval ha ezt a "mindent-mindennel-is-kompatibisnek-akaró" mentalitást rá akarják erőltetni egy nem véletlenül zárt szemléletet képviselő cégre, akkor az iOS-ből lesz egy windows-szintű megbízhatósági faktorral rendelkező rendszer. Ha erre vágynék, akkor vennék olcsóbban androidos cuccokat vagy visszatérnék a windows-ra.
A Google TV okosítóm például androidos, de mivel nem munkaeszközöm, ezért kevésbé érdekel, hogy mennyire jól működik. De mivel tudom, hogy a Google csinálja a hardvert és a rendszert is ő reszeli rá, ezért még mindig jobban megbízok benne, mint más hasonló termékben. Az Apple-ben is azért bízom meg, mert ők tervezik a konfigurációt és a rendszert is rá és nincsen másra mutogatás, hogy most miért is nem működik a dolog.
Szóval azért nem értem, hogy mire az EU-s hiszti, mert senki sem kötelezi az embereket, hogy csak iPhone-t vehetnek. Ráadásul kevesebbeknek is van/lesz az ára miatt, mint az android-os telefont vásárlóknak, szóval ezért sem értem a dolgot.

Az apple a 25% iphone reszesedesevel mar jelentosnek szamit?