Kedvenc fortune

"The temperature of Heaven can be rather accurately computed from available
data. Our authority is Isaiah 30:26, "Moreover, the light of the Moon
shall be as the light of the Sun and the light of the Sun shall be sevenfold,
as the light of seven days." Thus Heaven receives from the Moon as much
radiation as we do from the Sun, and in addition seven times seven (49) times
as much as the Earth does from the Sun, or fifty times in all. The light we
receive from the Moon is one ten-thousandth of the light we receive from the
Sun, so we can ignore that. With these data we can compute the temperature
of Heaven. The radiation falling on Heaven will heat it to the point where
the heat lost by radiation is just equal to the heat received by radiation,
i.e., Heaven loses fifty times as much heat as the Earth by radiation. Using
the Stefan-Boltzmann law for radiation, (H/E)^4 = 50, where E is the absolute
temperature of the earth (-300K), gives H as 798K (525C). The exact
temperature of Hell cannot be computed, but it must be less than 444.6C, the
temperature at which brimstone or sulphur changes from a liquid to a gas.
Revelations 21:8 says "But the fearful, and unbelieving ... shall have their
part in the lake which burneth with fire and brimstone." A lake of molten
brimstone means that its temperature must be at or below the boiling point,
or 444.6C (Above this point it would be a vapor, not a lake.) We have,
then, that Heaven, at 525C is hotter than Hell at 445C.
-- "Applied Optics", vol. 11, A14, 1972"

ps. Tudom, hosszú és tördeletlen, bocs :-)

( tiger | 2008. 04. 15., k – 14:01 )

:D
---
Ketchup elementál megidézése a sajt síkra

( numen v | 2008. 04. 15., k – 15:21 )

lol.

—-—-— 

int getRandomNumber() {
return 4;	//szabályos kockadobással választva.
	       //garantáltan véletlenszerű.
}	      //xkcd

( Nyosigomboc v | 2008. 04. 15., k – 23:27 )

Ez a kollega is hasonlo kovetkeztetesre jutott, bar mas ervelessel:

so, at this college there was an extra credit question "Is hell endothermic or exothermic"
this is what one kid wrote:
First, we postulate that if souls exist, then they must have some mass.
If they do, then a mole of souls can also have a mass. So, at what rate are souls moving into hell and at what rate are souls leaving? I think that we can safely assume that once a soul gets to hell, it will not leave. Therefore, no souls are leaving.

As for souls entering hell, lets look at the different religions that exist in the world today. Some of these religions state that if you are not a member of their religion, you will go to hell. Since, there are more than one of these religions and people do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all people and all souls go to hell.
With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in hell to increase exponentially.

Now, we look at the rate of change in volume in hell. Boyle's Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in hell to stay the same, the ratio of the mass of souls and volume needs to stay constant.
So, if hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter hell, then the temperature and pressure in hell will increase until all hell breaks loose (i.e.,Hell is exothermic).
Of course, if hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in hell, than the temperature and pressure will drop until hell freezes over (i.e.,Hell is endothermic).
So which is it? If we accept the postulate given by Ms.Therese Banyan during my freshman year, "That it will be a cold night in hell before I go out with you," and take into account the fact that I still have not succeeded in having a relationship with her, the second case cannot be true. Therefore, hell is exothermic.
the kid was the only one who got credit

Nagyon gyenge, es nagyon szabad forditasban angolul nem tudok kedveert (kb):

suliban volt egy kerdes plusz pontert: a pokol endoterm vagy exoterm? (no/csokken a homerseklet)
ezt irta az egyik srac:
Eloszor is, abbol a feltetelezesbol kiindulva, hogy a lelek letezik, kell, hogy legyen tomege.
Ha van, akkor egy mol leleknek szinten van tomege.
Szoval.. milyen aranyban kerulnek pokolra a lelkek, es milyen aranyban kerulnek ki onnan? Azt hiszem, nyugodtan feltetelezhetjuk, hogy ha egy lelek pokolra jut, nem jut ki onnan. Szoval egy lelek sem hagyja el a poklot.
Ahogy a lelkek pokolra kerulnek, meg kell vizsgalnunk tobb kulonbozo vallast. Nehanyban azt allitjak, hogy ha nem vagy az adott vallas hive, akkor pokolra jutsz. Mivel senki sem hive egyszerre egynel tobb vallasnak, ebbol kovetkezik, hogy mindenki valamilyen pokolra fog jutni.
A szuletesi es halalozasi aranyokbol kikovetkeztethetjuk, hogy a pokolbeli lelkek szama exponencialisan no.
Es most vizsgaljuk meg a pokol terfogatvaltozasat! Boyle torvenye szerint ahhoz, hogy a nyomas es a homerseklet allando maradjon, a lelkek tomegenek es terfogatanak hanyadosanak allandonak kell lennie.
Szoval, ha a pokol a bejuto lelkek mennyisegenel lassabban tagul, akkor a homerseklet es nyomas noni fog. (szoval exoterm)
Ha gyorsabban tagul, akkor a homerseklet es nyomas csokken, amig a pokol befagy. (endoterm)
Szoval? Melyik? Ha elfogadjuk azt a tovabbi posztulatumot, amit Ms. Therese Banyan mondott nekem fiatalabb eveimben: "majd akkor randizok veled, ha a pokol befagy", es szamitasba veszem azt is, hogy azota sem volt vele kapcsolatom, akkor a masodik lehetoseget kizarhatjuk, kovetkezeskepp a pokol exoterm.
Ez a srac kapott egyedul pontot a kerdesre.

----
Sooner or later you had to talk, even if it was only because you'd run out of things to throw. - Pratchett
honlap készítés