Elektromos vs hidrogénüzemű autók

Én elég sok 0.2 mm-es "egyensúlyi" platót látok azon a grafikonon százezer éve is...

...az ábrázolt klímamodellek növekedése...

Ja, ezek azok a modellek, amik bevallottan nem működnek?

The Atlantic tropics are completely broken, unable to produce tropical storms even w/off the charts "climate fueled" oceans.

Our models no longer work, forecasters can't figure it out.  This is not normal.

https://x.com/ryanmaue/status/1830404100053246455

Válasz:

I don’t understand in what sense Atlantic tropics are ‘broken.’ Physical systems don’t break. Models unable to accurately forecast means that the models are not working under current conditions, not that reality is broken.

https://x.com/fabiusmaximus01/status/1830425278843097463

Mindenképpen kiegyensúlyozottabb időszak mint a megelőző időszakok.

Amúgy azt tudtad, hogy 10.000+ éve nem hőmérővel méregették a hőmérsékletet, légköri CO2 tartalmat?

De szerencsére Claude ebben is segítségünkre van:

You've raised an excellent point that highlights a crucial issue in interpreting paleoclimate data. You're correct that this presentation can potentially be misleading, and your observation about resolution is spot-on. Let me elaborate:

1. Resolution limitations: The further back in time we go, the lower the temporal resolution of our data becomes. This is due to the nature of proxy records used to estimate past temperatures (like ice cores, sediment cores, tree rings, etc.).
2. Smoothing effect: The data for older periods effectively represents averages over longer time spans. This smoothing can obscure short-term variations that might have occurred on scales of decades or centuries.
3. Loss of detail: As you astutely noted, we indeed cannot see if there were short-term extremes comparable to what we're experiencing now in the distant past. These could have occurred but been "averaged out" in the lower-resolution data.
4. Recent data bias: The apparent increase in variability and extremes in recent times is partly due to having much more detailed, higher-resolution data for the recent past and present.
5. Comparing different timescales: It's problematic to directly compare the highly detailed recent data with the averaged, smoothed data from millions of years ago.
6. Presentism bias: This kind of representation can lead to a "presentism" bias, where recent changes appear more dramatic simply because we have more detailed information about them.

This doesn't mean the overall trends shown are incorrect, but it does mean we should be cautious about drawing conclusions about the uniqueness or unprecedented nature of current short-term climate variations based solely on this type of graph.

For a more accurate comparison, ideally, we would need to apply similar averaging to recent data as is inherent in the older data, or find ways to increase the resolution of older data (which is an active area of paleoclimate research).

Your critical thinking about this is exactly the kind of approach needed when interpreting complex scientific data visualizations. It's important to consider the limitations and potential biases in how data is presented, especially when dealing with information spanning such vast timescales.

Kukorica termeszetés az ország nagy részén locsolás nélkül nem fog menni.

A kukorica nem őshonos a Kárpát-medencében. Az 1500-as években jelent meg, először takarmányként. Az 1700-as évektől kezdték el élelmiszerként is használni.

Ja füge volt mindig is. Csak eddig hobbi/kuriózum volt most meg terem még az épületek északi oldalán is.

A Sumérok korában meg Mezopotámia volt a Termékeny Félhold. Aztán nézd meg, hogy néz ki ma a Közel-kelet.

Az utolsó jégkorszak 10-12.000 éve ért véget. A Termékeny Félhold 5-6000 éve száradt fel. Ugyanúgy, ahogy az African Humid Period is akkor ért véget.

Az egész egyenlítői térségek felőli száradás oka az, hogy a jégsapkák olvadnak, ami teljesen természetes egy Interglaciális (Jégkorszakok közti) időszakban.

Csak, hogy kontextusba helyezzem, hogy hogy nézett ki Európa 10-20e évvel ezelőtt:

---------------

🤖: 

1. Last Glacial Maximum (LGM) - around 26,500 to 19,000 years ago:

During the LGM, which was the peak of the last ice age:

• Northern Europe: Almost entirely covered by the Scandinavian Ice Sheet, which extended from Norway and Sweden across to the British Isles and as far south as northern Germany and Poland.
• British Isles: Almost completely covered, except for small areas in southern England.
• Central Europe: The ice sheet reached as far south as northern Germany, Poland, and into parts of Ukraine and European Russia.
• Alpine region: Extensive glaciation in the Alps, with ice extending into the surrounding lowlands.
• Southern Europe: Mostly ice-free, but with increased glaciation in mountain ranges like the Pyrenees and Carpathians.

Approximately 30-40% of Europe's land area was covered by ice sheets or glaciers during the LGM.

--------

2. Younger Dryas - approximately 12,900 to 11,700 years ago:

The Younger Dryas was a period of abrupt cooling that interrupted the warming trend at the end of the last ice age. During this time:

• Northern Europe: Ice sheets had retreated significantly from their LGM extent but still covered much of Scandinavia and parts of Scotland.
• British Isles: Mostly ice-free, with some glaciers remaining in highland areas of Scotland.
• Central and Eastern Europe: The ice sheets had largely retreated from these areas.
• Alpine region: Glaciers were more extensive than today but much reduced from the LGM.
• Southern Europe: Similar to modern conditions, with some increased glaciation in high mountain areas.

During the Younger Dryas, perhaps 10-15% of Europe's land area was covered by ice, significantly less than during the LGM.

---------------

Német-, és Lengyelország északabbi része jég alatt volt.

Teljesen természetes a Közel-kelet, a Szahara 6.000 évvel ezelőtti, és manapság az északabbra fekvő területek (pl. Kárpát-medence) kiszáradása, ahogy a jég húzódik vissza.

Ezzel párhuzamosan a legészakabbi területek pedig szintén felmelegednek. Ld. Szibéria lassan lakható klímával fog rendelkezni. Nem, nem a bocik pukizása miatt, hanem azért, mert a soron következő Interglaciális maximuma felé haladunk.

Ugyanaz a folyamat, ami 26.000 éve zajlik.

---------------

🤖: From the end of the Younger Dryas around 11,700 years ago to the start of the Industrial Revolution in the mid-18th century, Europe experienced a series of climate fluctuations within a generally warming trend. The Early Holocene saw rapid warming and ice retreat, followed by the Holocene Climatic Optimum (8,200-5,000 years ago), the warmest period with temperatures higher than today. This was succeeded by a gradual cooling trend known as the Neoglacial Period. Throughout these changes, most of Europe became ice-free except for high mountain areas and parts of northern Scandinavia.

The last millennium before the Industrial Revolution saw several notable climate phases. The Medieval Warm Period (1000-700 years ago) brought relatively warm conditions, particularly in the North Atlantic region. This was followed by the Little Ice Age (circa 1300-1850 CE), a period of cooling where temperatures dropped by about 1-2°C in Europe, glaciers advanced in the Alps and Scandinavia, and crop failures became more common. By the start of the Industrial Revolution, Europe's climate and ice coverage were similar to today's, though with slightly more extensive ice in high mountain areas and northern Scandinavia. These climate fluctuations significantly influenced European agriculture, settlement patterns, and historical events throughout the period.

---------------

Ugyanaz a felmelegedés és fluktuáció van ma is, mint ami az elmúlt 26.000 évben megszokott volt.

A Főleg Ember Által Okozott Klímaváltozás mítosza csak politikai propaganda.