( Hevi | 2024. 09. 20., p – 17:14 )

🤖 (Grok): Based on the information available up to September 20, 2024, here are some brief examples where Thierry Breton's policies have been criticized for potentially hurting EU innovation:

1. EU AI Act: Critics argue that this legislation imposes strict compliance requirements on AI developers, particularly for "high-risk" AI systems. This might increase the cost and complexity of developing AI technologies in Europe, potentially driving AI innovation to more regulatory lenient regions like the US

2. Digital Markets Act (DMA): While aimed at ensuring fair competition, there's a perspective that the stringent rules could inadvertently disadvantage smaller tech companies in the EU or startups due to high compliance costs, thus stifling innovation.

3. Resignation and Sentiment from Tech Community: Following Thierry Breton's resignation, there was a sentiment expressed on platforms like X that his policies were seen as a burden to innovation. For instance, his approach was perceived to create a hostile environment for tech companies, which might have encouraged some to move their operations or focus their growth outside of the EU.

4. Regulation Over Innovation: There's a narrative that Breton's push for heavy regulation, although aimed at protecting consumers and ensuring ethical AI development, might slow down the pace at which new technologies can be developed and adopted within the EU. This could be seen as placing Europe at a competitive disadvantage compared to regions with more relaxed regulatory environments.

5. Impact on Startups: Comments from startup founders and tech commentators on platforms like X suggested that policies championed by Breton, like the AI Act, made it exceedingly difficult to start or scale AI startups in the EU, thereby potentially hurting the region's position in the global tech landscape.

These examples reflect a perspective where regulation, although well-intentioned for consumer protection and fair market practices, might come at the cost of agility in innovation, particularly in fast-evolving sectors like AI and digital services. However, it's worth mentioning that these criticisms represent one side of the debate, with others arguing that such regulations could lead to more sustainable and ethically sound technological development in the long term.