"a szimpla 2 csatornás nyilvan nem más"
Persze. Mert gondolom megnezted, fel/le/felkonvertaltad es osszehasonlitottad a ket adathalmazt. Ugyanis ezesetben 0 kulonbsegnek kell kijojjon a ketto kozott, ami valoszinutlen. Pont azert keszul mas masterbol a CD es az SACD, hogy legyen kulonbseg. Kulonben nem lenne ertelme megvenni (eladni) a dragabbat. Remaster mint olyan megvan?
Az ABX tesztet is gondolom ugy vegezted, hogy az ne befolyasoljon, nem kapcsolgattal input source-ok kozott, volt downsampling majd ebbol ekszult egy darab hangfile megszakitasok es DAC kapcsolgatasok nelkul lejatszva oly modon, hogy te sem tudtad mikor melyik hallhato.
'Claims both published and anecdotal are regularly made for audibly superior sound quality for two-channel audio encoded with longer word lengths and/or at higher sampling rates than the 16-bit/44.1-kHz CD standard. The authors report on a series of double-blind tests comparing the analog output of high-resolution players playing high-resolution recordings with the same signal passed through a 16-bit/44.1-kHz "bottleneck." The tests were conducted for over a year using different systems and a variety of subjects. The systems included expensive professional monitors and one high-end system with electrostatic loudspeakers and expensive components and cables. The subjects included professional recording engineers, students in a university recording program, and dedicated audiophiles. The test results show that the CD-quality A/D/A loop was undetectable at normal-to-loud listening levels, by any of the subjects, on any of the playback systems. The noise of the CD-quality loop was audible only at very elevated levels.'
"Vagy csak szimplan nekem van igazam, merthogy hallom. :)"
Teljesen ertelmetlen a pszichiatrian a beteggel vitatkozni arrol, hogy neki csak 2 karja van, hisz' o _tudja_, hogy igazabol 3.