( st3v3 | 2025. 09. 19., p – 16:42 )

miért nem beszél róla senki

Mert ez "csak" az épp aktuálisan legújabb (de összességében már sokadik) építőkocka az EU-s totális cenzúra infrastruktúrában. Lassan de főzik a békát.

Már hivatkoztam párszor korábban:

How global government pushes censorship

Paul Coleman is executive director of Alliance Defending Freedom and has been involved in more than 20 cases before the European Court of Human Rights. He is the author of Censored (2016), about the rise of European hate crime laws. He joins UnHerd’s Freddie Sayers to demystify the inner workings of the international censorship complex.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y5QhGv4hdjw

A hivatkozott forrás médium (ugyanazok akik a fenti videót is jegyzik) cikke:

Inside the disinformation industry A government-sponsored agency is censoring journalism

Our team re-reviewed the domain, the rating will not change as it continues to have anti-LGBTQI+ narratives… The site authors have been called out for being anti-trans. Kathleen Stock is acknowledged as a ‘prominent gender-critical’ feminist.”

This was part of an email sent to UnHerd at the start of January from an organisation called the Global Disinformation Index. It was their justification, handed down after a series of requests, for placing UnHerd on a so-called “dynamic exclusion list” of publications that supposedly promote “disinformation” and should therefore be boycotted by all advertisers.[..]

https://unherd.com/2024/04/inside-the-disinformation-industry/

Még a washington post is megemlékezett az esetükről és az abból kipattant utánajárásukról és eredményeiről..

How ‘fighting disinformation’ turns into political censorship


[..]UnHerd, the Britain-based publication I lead, published an investigation on April 17 into a transatlantic organization called the Global Disinformation Index. We revealed that, having received money from the U.S. State Department, as well as the British, German and European Union governments, the GDI issues what amount to blacklists of news publications, on highly tendentious grounds, that online advertising exchanges then consult and can use to justify turning off ad revenue.[..]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/05/08/disinformation-polit…