( trey | 2012. 10. 28., v – 15:30 )

Nix (a hiba eredeti bejelentője) írta:

My latest tests indicate that unless you use journal_checksum or journal_async_commit (which implies journal_checksum), neither of which are the default, you appear to be safe. Unless you use nobarrier *too* (which you really shouldn't unless you have suitable hardware, which means battery-backed disk controllers: a PSU isn't good enough), you will see a journal abort and a readonly remount of the fs at next mount. You need both journal_async_commit *and* nobarrier to get no journal abort and silent fs corruption.

--
trey @ gépház