A Lavabit alapítója megpróbált ellenállni az FBI azon kérésének, hogy adja át az e-mail titkosítás kulcsait

napszemüveges sünöknek

nevettem.

És lefizetni a futárt (third party, ugyebár), hogy az FBI ajtajában essen hasra egy nyitott dobozzal a kezében :)

BlackY

http://henrikalexandersson.blogspot.se/2013/09/must-see-caspar-bowden-e…

Snowden’s revelations about PRISM show that Cyber mass-surveillance at the transnational level induces systemic breaches of fundamental rights. These breaches lead us to question the scale of transnational mass surveillance and its implications for our democracies.

It is the question of the nature, the scale, and the depth of surveillance that can be tolerated in and between democracies.

However, all these persons are not protected in the same way, especially if they are not US citizens. The EU citizen is therefore particularly fragile in this configuration connecting US intelligence services, private companies that provide services at the global level and the ownership they can exercise over their data. It is clear that if EU citizens do not have the same level of protections as the US citizens, because of the practices of the US intelligence services and the lack of effective protections, they will become the first victims of these systems. Freedom of thought, opinion, expression and of the press are cardinal values that have to be preserved. Any citizen of the EU has the right to have a private life.

The FISA definition of “foreign intelligence information” has been amended several times to include specific and explicit categories for e.g. money laundering, terrorism, weapons of mass-destruction, but has always included two limbs which seem almost unlimited in scope. When the terms are unwound it includes 42:

information with respect to a foreign-based political organization or foreign territory that relates to, and if concerning a United States person is necessary to the conduct of the foreign affairs of the United States. [emphasis added]

This definition is of such generality that from the perspective of a non-American it appears any data of assistance to US foreign policy is eligible, including expressly political surveillance over ordinary lawful democratic activities.

A historical account of US various surveillance programmes (precursors to Echelon, PRISM, etc.) and US legislation in the field of surveillance (FISA and FAA) shows that the US has continuously disregarded the fundamental rights of non-US citizens.

In Particular, the scope of FAA coupled with expressly ‘political’ definitions of what constitutes ‘foreign intelligence information’ creates a power of mass-surveillance specifically targeted at the data of non-US persons located outside the US, which eludes effective control by current and proposed EU Data Protection regulation.

http://www.europarl.europa.eu/meetdocs/2009_2014/documents/libe/dv/brie…

"The public now has to think about the fact that anybody in public life, or person in a position of influence in government, business or bureaucracy, now is thinking about what the NSA knows about them. So how can we trust that the decisions that they make are objective and that they aren't changing the decisions that they make to protect their career? That strikes at any system of representative government."

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/30/microsoft-privacy-chief-nsa

"One last thought - imagine there's a wiretapping system that goes into an internet point. What does the FBI or CIA do when it taps a fibre? Each - NSA, CIA, FBI - gets this data. The problem isn't just the NSA, it's all of these agencies working together, they've subverted our democracy.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/30/privacy-and-surveillance-j…

"-> nem akarjak, hogy kideruljon, hogy fel tudjak torni "
Akkor elég lett volna nekik a nyomtatott kulcs, és azt mondják, OCR-ezték, köszönjük.
"-> kikenyszeritik a kulcs atadast, hogy hivatkozhasssanak arra, igy tudtak meg"
A kulcsot megkapták, nekik _digitálisan_ kellett. Ha csak alibinek kellett volna, jó lett volna nekik a papír alapú is :)

--
PtY - www.onlinedemo.hu

tessek :-)

Szerint a 1969 dolgozat Theodore Chen, fontos fogalom gondolat reform, hogy az "új szocialista ember," az elképzelésen alapul, hogy a kommunista forradalom azon alapul, "új férfi új elmék, új ötletek, új érzelmek, és az új hozzáállás. "Így, mielőtt az új életforma is érvényesül, a régi meg kell szüntetni. Kínában mind a régi és az új generációs kellett remolded szerint kommunista ideológia, így a döntéshozatal és átalakítás az "új ember" vált alapvető feladata a kommunista forradalom és a fő cél az oktatás.

--
"Pontosan ez a ti bajotok. Ez a kurva nagy csőlátás. [...]" (bviktor)